Autism, Time Perception, and Continuity in Social Relationships

- tsp
Last update 14 May 2025
Reading time 36 mins

⚠️ Author’s Note / Disclaimer This article is not part of my field of studies or research. It emerged out of a simple discussion which lead to a literature review and this small summary. While I am not a medical expert, this summary has been compiled to the best of my ability. Though I aim for accuracy, there may be errors.

Introduction

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by differences in social communication, restricted interests, and repetitive behaviors. Within the spectrum, individuals with Asperger’s syndrome or low support needs (often termed “high-functioning autism”) possess average or above-average intelligence and relatively intact language, yet still exhibit the core social-cognitive differences of ASD. An intriguing question is how autistic individuals perceive the passage of time in social contexts – specifically, whether they experience people or relationships as if they had “vanished” and later “resumed” unchanged, much like physical objects under object permanence. In typical development, people understand that relationships evolve over time and that others continue to change even when out of sight. This review examines evidence on time perception in autism, object permanence and its social analog, and how expectations of continuity in relationships might differ in autistic minds. Key cognitive factors – episodic memory, theory of mind, executive function, and neurobiological underpinnings – are explored to understand whether autistic individuals may indeed treat social connections in a start-stop fashion. Empirical findings from both diagnosed autistic people and those with high autistic traits (but no formal diagnosis) are included, with attention to differences across support needs and developmental stages.

Time Perception and Temporal Continuity in Autism

Many autistic individuals report atypical experiences of time. They often struggle with the sense of temporal continuity, describing life as a series of disjointed events rather than a continuous flow. For example, one autobiographical account noted problems with sequencing and “lack of [temporal] continuity in my sense of personal history”[1]. Clinicians have similarly observed that autistic people can have “difficulties [in] comprehending the passage of time and linking it with ongoing activities”[1]. These qualitative reports suggest that autistic individuals may not naturally integrate past, present, and future events in the same way neurotypical individuals do.

Laboratory studies support the notion of disrupted temporal processing in ASD, especially for higher-order time cognition. Autistic children and adults show impairments in tasks requiring them to order events chronologically or infer temporal sequences. In one study, autistic participants were less able to recall the correct order of past events compared to controls[1]. Another set of experiments by Boucher et al. introduced the concept of “diachronic thinking,” defined as the capacity to think about events across time (both past and future). They identified components like “Transformation” – understanding that qualitative or quantitative changes occur over time – and found that autistic children and adolescents scored significantly lower than neurotypical peers on all such measures[1]. In other words, autistic individuals had difficulty envisioning that people or situations could change between one time point and another, indicating a weaker grasp of temporal continuity.

Related to these findings are differences in memory profiles in autism, particularly episodic memory (memory for personal events bound to a time and place) versus semantic memory (general facts and knowledge). Research consistently shows that autistic people have impairments in episodic memory but relative preservation of semantic memory[2]. Autistic individuals tend to recall fewer specific details of past experiences and to show reduced coherence in their personal narratives[3]. For example, they may remember facts about what happened (semantic content) but not richly re-experience the event with context, emotion, and sequence. Autobiographical memory studies report diminished retrieval of episodic details and difficulty linking events into an ongoing story, with one meta-analysis noting that individuals with ASD produce less causally and temporally connected narratives than neurotypicals[3]. Importantly, these deficits extend to episodic future thinking – the ability to imagine possible future scenarios – which, like episodic recall, is less robust in autism[3]. his combination of weaker past recollection and limited future simulation can contribute to a fragmented sense of time. An autistic person may not automatically sense how yesterday blends into today or tomorrow, which could make each social encounter feel more isolated in time. Notably, basic time perception (such as discriminating brief durations) is often intact or only inconsistently affected in autism; the most pronounced differences emerge in higher-order timing tasks that rely on memory, planning, and sequencing[1]. In sum, autism is associated with a diminished intuition for temporal continuity: events in an autistic person’s life may be experienced as discrete episodes rather than parts of an ongoing narrative.

Object Permanence and Social Relationship Continuity

Object permanence – the understanding that objects continue to exist even when hidden – is a fundamental cognitive milestone in infancy. In autism, basic object permanence is typically achieved; studies have found that young children with autism show little or no impairment in object permanence tasks relative to other children[4]. In other words, an autistic child knows that a toy under a blanket still exists. However, the question here is whether autistic individuals apply an analogous concept to people and relationships. Do they intuitively understand that a person’s feelings, personality, or the relationship itself continues to exist and evolve when that person is absent? Or do they, in effect, treat an out-of-sight person as mentally “out of existence” until interaction resumes?

Psychologists sometimes refer to object constancy or emotional permanence in the context of relationships. Emotional permanence is the ability to maintain an emotional bond with others even when apart – the understanding that love, friendship, and other feelings persist through time and distance[5]. In typical development, children gradually learn that their parents still love them when not in the room, or that a friend who moved away still remembers them. For some autistic individuals, this concept is less intuitive. While they logically know people don’t literally vanish, they may feel as if absent people fade from their mind. Notably, many autistic people describe an “out of sight, out of mind” experience in relationships. They might not actively miss others in the way neurotypicals do. For example, one autistic adult reported: “I do not miss people that I stop interacting with. I mean absolutely no one.”[5] She described her feelings for people as a light switch – on when the person is present, and off when the person is absent[6]. This firsthand account illustrates how an autistic individual can deeply care about someone while together, yet virtually forget about them when apart, with the emotional connection resuming only upon re-engagement.

Difficulties with social permanence can manifest in several ways for autistic individuals:

Overall, these patterns create an effect akin to social object permanence deficits. The person is not physically forgotten – an autistic individual will recognize a friend who returns after years – but the social-emotional context might be essentially reset. A friend who moves away could feel virtually “gone” in the interim, and upon reunion the autistic person may treat them as if they had literally been on pause. This can be jarring in social situations: neurotypical people might expect acknowledgment of time passed (“How have you been?”) or changes (“What’s new since we last met?”), whereas an autistic person might dive straight into a previous topic or assume the same rapport and shared knowledge as before. If the other person has undergone significant life changes, the autistic individual may need it to be explicitly explained, rather than intuitively sensing it. Indeed, maintaining relationships requires active effort that autistic individuals might not instinctively invest; one guide for autism noted that keeping in contact can be difficult because autistic people may not know how often to check in and might either neglect to do so or worry when communication lags[8]

Theory of Mind: Understanding Others Changes Over Time

A core cognitive difference that can contribute to these phenomena is a difficulty with Theory of Mind (ToM) – the ability to attribute independent mental states (beliefs, desires, knowledge, emotions) to others and understand that those states can differ from one’s own. Autistic individuals, including those with Asperger’s, often show delayed or atypical development of ToM. Even as adults, when they have learned compensatory strategies, they may still find it effortful to infer what others know or feel. Tracking changes in other people over time inherently demands ToM: one must appreciate that the other person has a life and mind of their own, continuing to accumulate experiences when absent. If ToM is weak, an autistic individual might not automatically consider what their friend has been doing or feeling while they were apart.

Classic developmental tests illustrate this issue. In the Sally-Anne false-belief test, for example, a neurotypical child understands that if Sally leaves the room during a change in a scene (say, a toy is moved), Sally will have a false belief when she returns – she did not witness the change. Many autistic children fail this test, indicating difficulty understanding that someone’s knowledge can differ based on their personal timeline. By extension, autistic individuals might not instinctively realize that “since I last saw John, there are things John experienced that I don’t know, and things I experienced that John doesn’t know.” Without that realization, they might not fill in the gap or update each other, leading to an implicit assumption of continuity (i.e. both still know and feel only what was true when they last met). This is not to say autistic people cannot learn these facts – often they explicitly learn to ask or tell (“What did I miss?”) – but it may not come as naturally.

Empirical research confirms that ToM abilities in autism relate to managing time-based social information. One striking example comes from studies on prospective memory – remembering to carry out an intention in the future. Time-based prospective memory (TBPM) requires one to remember to do something after a delay (e.g., “call Alice in an hour”), whereas event-based prospective memory involves an external cue (e.g., “give Alice a message when you see her”). Williams et al. (2013) found that autistic children were significantly impaired in time-based prospective memory but not in event-based prospective memory[9]. In other words, they struggled with tasks where they had to internally monitor the passage of time to execute an action. Crucially, among the autistic group, performance on the time-based tasks was strongly associated with their theory of mind skills, and not with their basic time estimation ability or general cognitive flexibility[9]. Those with poorer ToM had a harder time remembering to act after a delay. One interpretation is that carrying out an intention after a gap (a form of temporal continuity) might require the person to take the perspective of their future self or consider the context at the future time – a process that overlaps with ToM and self-projection. Thus, deficits in ToM can translate into difficulty envisioning the state of minds at different times, whether one’s own or others’. By extension, imagining how another person might have changed while absent is challenging if one does not intuitively represent the contents of the other person’s mind.

Another aspect of ToM is understanding emotions and subtle social cues, which is often atypical in autism. Autistic individuals may not automatically pick up on a friend’s changed mood or changed interests unless explicitly signaled. For example, if a friend returns after months feeling hurt that there was no contact, an autistic person with limited mentalizing might not have predicted that emotion. Difficulties in recognizing and remembering others’ emotional states over time have been documented[5]. Autistic individuals might need direct communication to realize that “time has passed and you didn’t call, and that upset your friend,” whereas a neurotypical might infer it. This again can make it seem as if the autistic person expected no change (they did not account for the friend becoming upset or distant). In reality, it reflects an underlying ToM gap – not readily seeing things from the other’s perspective across time.

In summary, theory of mind deficits can lead autistic people to underappreciate the independent timeline of others’ thoughts and feelings. If you do not intuitively imagine what others are experiencing when you’re not with them, you may effectively perceive them as temporarily absent minds. When they return to your presence, you pick up from the last shared point of reference. This cognitive style contributes significantly to the “vanish and resume unchanged” phenomenon in autistic-social relationships.

Executive Function and Cognitive Style

Beyond social cognition per se, autistic people often have differences in executive function (EF) – the set of mental skills involved in planning, working memory, inhibition, and cognitive flexibility. These differences can further impact how continuity is handled in relationships.

A notable trait in autism is rigidity or inflexible thinking. Autistic individuals tend to prefer routines, predictability, and familiar patterns, and they can be resistant to change[8]. This need for sameness, a diagnostic feature of ASD, can extend to their mental representations of people. If a person is represented one way in the autistic individual’s mind, there may be a bias to keep that representation unchanged (a form of mental inertia or set maintenance). Updating that representation when new information arises (e.g., hearing that an old friend has a new job or has developed a new hobby) might not be automatic. It may require conscious effort to revise the “file” they have on that person. In some cases, the autistic individual might even resist or dislike changes in people close to them, because it disrupts what they had come to expect. This is analogous to how changes in routine can cause distress; a change in a person (say, a family member suddenly behaving differently) can also be disconcerting if one’s mind had assumed continuity. Executive dysfunction, especially poor cognitive flexibility, underlies this difficulty in swiftly adapting to change. Meta-analyses confirm that autistic people have greater trouble with cognitive flexibility across the lifespan than neurotypicals[10,11], which means they may take longer to adjust their thinking in response to new situations or information.

Working memory differences might also play a role. Autistic individuals can have uneven working memory profiles; some aspects (like visual detail memory) may be strong, but prospective working memory (holding an intention in mind) or multi-step planning can be weaker[1,9]. If an autistic person does not actively remind themselves of an absent friend (“I should call Sam next week”), they might simply forget to think about them. Without environmental cues or prompts, the friend’s presence in memory fades. Many autists benefit from external systems – calendars, reminders, routines – to maintain social contacts, essentially offloading the continuity task to a tool. This indicates that internally, spontaneously, their executive system may not be cuing them to maintain the thread of a relationship. One study noted that autistic individuals might show relatively good performance when external structure is provided (event-based cues) but poor performance when they must rely on self-initiated planning in time-based tasks[9]. This aligns with everyday observations that an autistic person may happily engage when a friend is physically present or reaches out to them (external cue), but they rarely initiate contact themselves (self-cue) because their executive system isn’t prodding them with the thought in the interim.

Another cognitive theory relevant here is Weak Central Coherence (WCC) – the tendency in autism to focus on details rather than the big picture. Those with autism often excel at noticing small details or remembering discrete facts, but may miss the broader narrative that connects pieces together[2]. Applied to social relationships, WCC might mean an autistic individual remembers specific conversations or traits about a person (e.g. their birthday, or that one time they went to a movie together) but not the ongoing story of the friendship. They might not automatically integrate those details into a holistic sense of “this is my friend over years, with whom I’ve shared a growing, evolving relationship.” Instead, memories can exist as separate snapshots – this outing, that chat – without a strong connective thread. This detail-focused cognitive style can make each encounter feel self-contained. If an autistic person recalls a friend only by scattered facts (likes trains, lives in Chicago, we met at school) and does not weave those into a timeline (“we used to play daily, then he moved, now we catch up once a year”), then during a long gap there is no active narrative of the friend progressing through life. The contextual integration is weak[2]. As a result, when the friend returns to memory or in person, the autistic individual retrieves those static facts (which likely haven’t changed) and interacts based on them, potentially missing that the context around those facts has changed (the friend might no longer like trains, or may have left Chicago, etc.). In short, a detail-focused, less integrative processing style can lead to a fragmented view of social time, where continuity is not constructed unless explicitly done so.

To illustrate, consider a neurotypical person who hasn’t seen a college friend in five years: they might still have a sense of that friend’s trajectory (graduated, started a job, maybe got married – gleaned from social media or mutual contacts) and emotional continuity (“I still feel close to them, even if we haven’t talked daily”). An autistic person might recall vivid details from college days with that friend yet have little notion of what happened in their life since – unless told – and might not feel “friendship” in their absence. They may, however, pick up exactly the same conversations about their old shared interests when they do meet, as if no time elapsed, because in their mind those details never decayed. This paradox of memory – strong retention of facts or routines, but weak updating of narratives – is a hallmark of the cognitive profile that can make social relationships appear discontinuous.

Psychological and Neurobiological Explanations

The interplay of time perception, memory, theory of mind, and executive function in autism provides a multi-faceted explanation for the observed patterns. Psychologically, one can view the issue as a difference in constructing a continuous sense of self and others. Research by Lind, Bowler, and colleagues has suggested that autistic individuals have difficulty with what is called self-continuity – linking past, present, and future self into a cohesive identity – due in part to their episodic memory impairments[3]. By extension, continuity of others (social identity of others over time) may also be poorly constructed. Autistic children sometimes treat people more as roles or based on immediate utility (e.g., expecting a teacher to always be exactly as they last saw them) and may not understand concepts like a teacher can also be a parent at home (failure of integration of multiple roles over time). While this usually improves with cognitive development, remnants of this literal and context-bound understanding can remain in higher-functioning autistic adults. They might intellectually know people change, yet their intuitive cognitive style doesn’t reinforce that understanding on a day-to-day basis.

From a neurobiological perspective, converging evidence points to atypical functioning of brain networks crucial for integrating experiences over time. The Default Mode Network (DMN), a set of brain regions (including medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate, and hippocampal/temporal areas) active during introspection and social cognition, is of particular interest. The DMN is normally engaged when we remember the past, imagine the future, or consider others’ perspectives – essentially, it underlies the ability to do “mental time travel” and social reflection[12]. In autism, numerous neuroimaging studies have found abnormal connectivity and activity in the DMN. For example, lower synchronization within the DMN and between the DMN and other networks correlates with social impairments in ASD[13]. These differences suggest that autistic brains may be less efficient at tasks like autobiographical recollection and theory of mind, which are needed for maintaining narratives about self and others. If the neural system responsible for thinking about what someone else is doing when they’re not in front of you is under-active or poorly connected, the result could be exactly what we see: out of sight, out of mind. Additionally, the hippocampus, which is key for forming episodic memories and spatial-temporal contexts, shows subtle structural and functional differences in autism according to some studies (e.g., differences in volume and connectivity). This could contribute to the reduced richness of context in memories[3], leaving memories of people less vivid and less linked to time cues. Neuropsychological research also indicates that tasks combining memory and ordering (such as remembering when something happened) are challenging for autistic individuals[1], further implicating fronto-hippocampal circuits in the deficit.

It’s worth noting that difficulties in “mentalizing” (understanding minds) and “chronesthesia” (awareness of time) might share neural resources. A theory called the “scene construction” or “self-projection” hypothesis proposes that remembering the past, envisioning the future, navigating space, and imagining others’ minds all draw on a common set of cognitive processes and brain regions[14]. Autism provides an interesting case study for this theory because, as one review pointed out, ASD is characterized by concurrent impairments in episodic memory, episodic future thinking, and theory of mind[14]. The co-occurrence of these impairments in high-functioning autistic adults supports the idea of a shared underlying mechanism. It suggests that an autistic person’s difficulty in recalling personal events with detail is fundamentally linked to their difficulty in envisaging someone else’s perspective or maintaining a social bond in absentia. Brain imaging shows that when neurotypical individuals engage these processes, the DMN “lights up,” but in autism this network may be hypoactive or not well-coordinated, leading to a poorer internal simulation of continuous social scenarios.

Executive function differences also have neurobiological correlates. Atypical development of frontal lobes and frontostriatal circuits in autism can explain the rigidity and planning difficulties observed. These neural differences mean an autistic brain might not spontaneously prioritize social planning (e.g., “it’s been a while since I talked to X, I should reach out”). In terms of neurotransmitter systems, some researchers have speculated that a high need for sameness could relate to imbalance in systems governing reward and prediction error – changes may not register as salient or may register as threats rather than expected variations, causing either inattention to change or anxiety to change, both of which can impede adapting one’s social thinking over time.

In summary, the “vanishing people” effect in autism can be seen as an emergent property of a cognitive system that is less geared toward linking times and minds. Psychologically, it reflects a style of information processing that is more static and detail-focused, and less narrative and inferential. Neurologically, it reflects atypical connectivity in brain networks that normally enable us to effortlessly maintain a sense of social continuity. These explanations are not mutually exclusive but complementary – the neurobiology underpins the psychology. Together they help us understand why an autistic individual might interact with a friend after a long absence as if picking up a book at the very same page they left it, with little sense that chapters have been written in between.

Empirical Findings and Individual Differences

When examining empirical research on these topics, it is important to recognize the diversity within the autism spectrum. Most studies of time perception, memory, and social cognition in autism have been conducted with individuals who have no intellectual disability (IQ in the normal range), which is directly relevant to those with Asperger’s or low support needs. These studies provide strong evidence of the patterns discussed:

Undiagnosed individuals with autistic traits (often studied via the Broad Autism Phenotype or by measuring autistic traits in the general population) also show milder versions of these effects. For example, even among neurotypical adults, those who score high on autistic trait measures tend to recall their personal past less vividly and have a less coherent sense of self over time[3]. One study found that neurotypical individuals with high autistic-like traits had a “less clear self-concept, related to a reduced ability to make meaning of important past life events,” compared to those with lower trait levels[3]. They may also demonstrate slight weaknesses in theory of mind or future planning. These findings suggest that the continuum of autistic traits in the population corresponds to a continuum in how people experience time and relationships. In other words, the more “autistic-minded” a person is, the more they might lean towards perceiving social life in segments rather than as a continuous narrative. This provides convergent evidence that the phenomenon is real and tied to autism-specific cognitive style, not simply a byproduct of clinical diagnosis or stigma.

When considering levels of support needs, there can be some differences in manifestation. Individuals with low support needs (Asperger’s) usually have the self-awareness and cognitive resources to notice something is different about how they relate to time and people, even if they can’t fully change it. They might report these experiences to researchers or therapists, as in the earlier quotes. They are also more likely to develop compensatory mechanisms – for instance, consciously learning social rules about staying in touch, or intellectually reminding themselves that “just because I haven’t seen my friend, doesn’t mean they aren’t still my friend.” Many high-functioning autistic adults devise explicit strategies to deal with their lack of intuitive social permanence, such as scheduling regular meetups to maintain friendships, or using logic to override the immediate feeling of disconnection (“I don’t feel close right now, but I know I am close to this person, so I will act accordingly”). These strategies can mitigate the impact, though they may remain effortful. By contrast, individuals with higher support needs (more severe autism, often with intellectual disability or limited communication) might not report their inner experiences, but caregivers and researchers observe analogous patterns. For example, a minimally verbal autistic child might not seek a parent who has left the room (suggesting an atypical object permanence or attachment response), or an autistic adult with intellectual impairments might not recognize an acquaintance after a year has passed, seemingly “resetting” the relationship. It has been noted, however, that basic object permanence and recognition memory are usually intact even in many severely autistic individuals[4] – they know the person when they see them. The issue is more with the social-emotional recognition: Do they react to the person as someone with whom they have an ongoing relationship, or just as a familiar face? Often, the emotional significance must be rekindled afresh. Additionally, individuals with more severe autism often have more pronounced deficits in memory and mentalizing[3], which likely amplifies the discontinuity effect. On the flip side, some profoundly autistic individuals form deep routines around people (for example, expecting a caregiver to always behave exactly the same way). If those routines are disrupted by the person changing or being absent, it can cause great distress – another indication of how inflexibly they may view relationships.

Developmental factors are also relevant. In early childhood, autistic signs can include atypical responses to separation and reunion. Some autistic toddlers do not exhibit the typical separation anxiety or stranger anxiety – a subset might seem aloof, as if parents “disappear” from mind when not present (though others show extreme distress instead; autism is heterogeneous). As children grow, those with autism often lag in social understanding milestones. For example, they might not engage in pretend play that involves characters with continuing identities, or they might prefer repetitive play that doesn’t require imagining change over time. School-age autistic children may have friendships based mostly on shared interests in the moment; if a classmate is absent for a week, the autistic child might not inquire about them, not out of lack of empathy, but because it doesn’t occur to them to do so. By adolescence and adulthood, many autistic individuals gain more insight and skills. They learn about concepts like people changing, friends moving on, romantic relationships needing upkeep, etc. Indeed, some cognitive research suggests that by adulthood, autistic people improve in certain semantic aspects of social knowledge – for instance, they understand the idea of loyalty or the idea that people have life stories[3]. However, the intuitive, gut-level processing might remain atypical. Adults with autism often report still feeling that they live in a more compartmentalized social world, even if they “know” otherwise. Importantly, interventions can help: for example, narrative therapy or social skills training that explicitly teaches how to reminisce, how to anticipate a friend’s needs, or how to update one’s image of someone can reinforce continuity. Some success has been noted in using visual timelines and storytelling with autistic individuals to improve their autobiographical memory and social communication[3]. This not only benefits self-identity but also helps them place friends and family into a timeline (“remember when we did X last year?” as a bridge to “let’s do Y now”). Thus, while the natural disposition in autism might be to perceive relationships in a piecemeal fashion, development and learning can fill in some gaps. By adulthood, especially for those who are diagnosed later in life and reflect on their experiences, there is often a conscious awareness of this issue. Many will say, for example, that they don’t miss people in the usual way and had to learn that others might interpret that as lack of care, so they now make efforts to demonstrate caring in more conventional ways.

To sum up, empirical evidence across ages and the spectrum supports the idea that autistic individuals can perceive social relationships in a discontinuous manner. The extent of this varies: those with milder autism might only experience a subtle version (perhaps feeling a bit distant when away from friends, or needing to remind themselves to keep in touch), whereas those more severely affected might literally seem to restart a relationship from scratch after any break. Crucially, these tendencies are not due to malice or lack of love; they stem from genuine cognitive processing differences. Autistic people are fully capable of loyalty and affection, but the expression of those feelings through time may not follow typical patterns. Recognizing this pattern allows others to interpret autistic behaviors more accurately – for instance, an autistic friend who hasn’t called in months might actually be looking forward to seeing you and assume everything is the same, rather than intentionally ignoring you. Likewise, an autistic family member might require direct updates about your life changes, because they won’t implicitly gather them from context or assume them over time.

Conclusion

Do autistic individuals perceive absent people as “vanished” and then pick up relationships as if unchanged? Research and first-person accounts suggest that, in many cases, yes – they often do, due to the unique way their brains process time, memory, and social information. Autistic people (especially those with low support needs/Asperger’s who can articulate it) frequently describe a disjointed sense of time and social connection. When someone is not in their immediate sphere, that person can essentially drop out of their mind, and when contact resumes, it may feel to the autistic individual as if no time has passed for the relationship. This is analogous to object permanence: the person was “out of sight” (and thus largely “out of mind”), but not gone forever – once they return into view, the autistic person recognizes them and resumes interaction based on the last remembered state. They might expect the friend to be the same friend, the relationship to function as it did before, and any new context to need explicit explanation. This review has highlighted several contributing factors to this phenomenon: atypical time perception and difficulties with temporal continuity, deficits in episodic memory (leading to fewer personal timestamps and less rich recollection of ongoing relationships)[3], challenges in theory of mind (reducing spontaneous insight into others’ lives when apart)[9], and executive function/cognitive style differences (promoting routine, sameness, and detail-focused processing over flexible, big-picture social thinking)[2]. Neurobiologically, these cognitive differences are linked to atypical development of brain networks for social-memory integration[13,14].

It is important to emphasize that “vanishing” others is not a deliberate choice by autistic individuals, nor a value judgment of the relationship. It is a cognitive quirk of how their memory and attention work. They often deeply appreciate their relationships when they are mentally engaged with them. The trouble is that engagement tends to be situational (tied to the here-and-now or explicit prompts) rather than continuous and self-sustaining. Because of this, misunderstandings can arise: neurotypical friends may feel forgotten or unimportant when an autistic person doesn’t reach out, and autistic individuals may be puzzled by the idea that they were expected to nurture an invisible connection. Bridging this gap requires understanding on both sides. Autistic people can benefit from support in developing strategies to simulate continuity – for instance, scheduling regular catch-ups, keeping photo reminders of loved ones or practicing recalling past shared experiences to strengthen emotional permanence[5,7]. Meanwhile, friends and family who know about this trait can interpret the autistic person’s behavior in a charitable light: absence of contact is likely an absence of mindfulness, not an absence of caring.

In conclusion, the way autistic individuals perceive time and change profoundly shapes their social world. Many do experience social relationships in a somewhat fragmented way, akin to object permanence for people, where others fade when absent and reappear as static figures in the next encounter. This does not mean autistic people cannot form long-term relationships – they absolutely can and do, often very loyally – but those relationships may follow a different rhythm, one that sometimes skips beats when out of sight. The continuity can be achieved, but it may rely on conscious effort and external structure more than intuitive emotional drive. By recognizing these differences, we can better support autistic individuals in their social lives and foster mutual understanding. Relationships, after all, are two-way: knowing that an autistic friend might not intuitively maintain the thread allows the neurotypical friend to help weave the continuity, and knowing that others expect some continuity allows the autistic person to learn how to provide it. With empathy and appropriate strategies, the gap between “vanish” and “resume” can be narrowed, enabling autistic individuals to keep people present in both heart and mind across time.

References

This article is tagged:

Data protection policy

Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Spielauer, Wien (webcomplains389t48957@tspi.at)

This webpage is also available via TOR at http://rh6v563nt2dnxd5h2vhhqkudmyvjaevgiv77c62xflas52d5omtkxuid.onion/

Valid HTML 4.01 Strict Powered by FreeBSD IPv6 support